I wouldn't be suprised if CBS themselves forged it, if it is infact forged.
Printable View
I wouldn't be suprised if CBS themselves forged it, if it is infact forged.
No, no. All I'm trying to say is that it is apparent that somebody, somebody forged this document. My question is this: Who did it? We know why but who is responsible for this? CBS? Dan Rather and his droogs? The "sources"?Quote:
Originally Posted by [AK?]Camelwalk
I'm quite aware of the media's "weasel-tactics" (I love calling it that) and to be honest, it pisses me off. Take this for example: Even as the story proliferated through out the net and into other media organizations, MSNBC and Yahoo! DID NOT include an update to the story. Thus, the original version of the story remained at it's prime. No mention of the probable forgery of the Bush documents whatsoever. All I saw were multiple stories based on the article. In all these articles, however, they all seemed quick to bash Bush for the documents.
As if this is all a preemptive strike conjured up by the media against the Bush administration and you know what? It probably is. This is merely an effort by the media to stir up controversy and knock Bush out of his lead in the polls. But then again, I could be wrong. As I stated before, innocent until proven guilty.
If it gets linked to Kerry you can stick a fork in him. He's done.
CBS is defending their reportQuote:
Originally Posted by [AK]Bribo
CBS: Communist Business Spies?
LOLQuote:
Originally Posted by [AK]Bribo
Oh bye the way, is it illegal if it was forgered and can they be forced to disclose there source?