let me get this straight:

squidly's defending his site because the site's backbone is a free content manager that anyone can install, and it so happens the content manager claims it supports w3c standards.

you get what you pay for, and since you didn't pay a cent in this case, you get shoddy code. cheapskate.

so rather than alerting the developers of their flaws, you'd rather be lazy and blame an open-source browser?

i fart in your general direction.

a majority does not always mean something is right. this is one of those cases.

write your own damn code.

i easily get pissed off about stuff like this.